【作者单位】and Family Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. 2 NCPC. 3 Family Medicine. 4 Family Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine. 5 NCPC and Family Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine.NCPC1 National Center for Primary Care
【出 处】Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
【摘 要】 This study evaluates electronic health record (EHR) adoption by primary care providers in Georgia to assess adoption disparities according to practice size and type, payer mix, and community characteristics. Frequency variances of EHR “Go Live” statu... 更多 >> This study evaluates electronic health record (EHR) adoption by primary care providers in Georgia to assess adoption disparities according to practice size and type, payer mix, and community characteristics. Frequency variances of EHR “Go Live” status were estimated. Odds ratios were calculated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Large practices and community health centers (CHCs) were more likely to Go Live (>80% EHR adoption) than rural health clinics and other underserved settings (53%). A significantly lower proportion (68.9%) of Medicaid predominant providers had achieved Go Live status and had a 47% higher risk of not achieving Go Live status than private insurance predominant practices. Disparities in EHR adoption rates may exacerbate existing disparities in health outcomes of patients served by these practices. Targeted support such as that provided to CHCs would level the playing field for practices now at a disadvantage. << 收起
